API comparison
Unified social media API compared: coverage, pricing, MCP support
10 min read · facts verified July 5, 2026
A unified social media API replaces a pile of per-platform integrations (each with its own OAuth, review process and breaking changes) with one endpoint. The market has real choices in 2026, and they differ on three axes that actually matter: how many platforms you get, how you pay, and whether AI agents can use it over MCP. Here is the field, with the facts checked.
Why teams buy a unified API at all
Building direct integrations means a Meta app review, a LinkedIn partner application, a TikTok audit and an X API subscription before your first post goes out, then permanent maintenance as each API changes. A unified API vendor carries that burden once for everyone: you get one consistent REST surface, hosted OAuth against the vendor's approved platform apps, and (increasingly) an MCP server so AI agents can call the same capabilities as typed tools.
The comparison table
Facts below come from each vendor's public pricing and documentation pages. Where a vendor's own pages disagreed with each other, the table says so rather than picking a number.
| API | Social coverage | Beyond social | Pricing model | Free tier | MCP support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modiva | 15 platforms | Yes: ads, CRM, ecommerce (31 integrations) | Per connected account | First 3 accounts free | Hosted MCP server, all integrations |
| Ayrshare | 13+ platforms incl. niche channels | No | Per profile, tiered | No (paid from $149/mo) | Official MCP searches docs; action MCP is community |
| Zernio | Social + ad networks | Ads only | Per account, $6 down to $1/account/mo | First 2 accounts free | Hosted MCP server |
| bundle.social | 14 platforms | No | Per post volume, unlimited accounts | 20 posts/mo, 3 accounts | Local MCP today; hosted on roadmap per their docs |
| Outstand | 10 platforms | No | $19/mo base + per post | No free tier listed | Hosted MCP, included with API key |
| SocialAPI.ai | Roughly 8 to 10 (their pages vary) | No | Tiered | 2 profiles, 10 posts/mo | Hosted MCP, multi-tenant OAuth 2.1 |
| Upload-Post | 12 to 13 (their pages vary) | No | Paid tiers; published pricing inconsistent when checked | Yes (limited) | Hosted + MIT open-source client |
| Blotato | 9 publishing targets | No (AI content tools instead) | AI credits, from $29/mo | 7-day trial only | API + MCP on paid plans |
Verified against public vendor pages on July 5, 2026. Confirm current numbers on each vendor's site before deciding.
Coverage: count the platforms you will actually use
Headline platform counts hide two things. First, breadth versus relevance: Ayrshare's coverage including niche channels like Snapchat and Telegram matters only if you post there; most B2B teams live on four networks. Second, depth per platform: posting is table stakes, but comment management, DM access and analytics vary widely. Modiva and Ayrshare expose engagement surfaces; several posting-focused APIs stop at publish and schedule.
The bigger structural difference is what sits beyond social. Zernio adds ad networks. Modiva adds ads plus CRM (HubSpot) and ecommerce (Shopify), which changes what an agent can do: correlate posts with store orders, or move a social lead into the CRM, without a second integration platform. Everyone else on the list is social-only.
Pricing models: per account, per post, per credit
Three models dominate, and the same workload prices wildly differently across them. Per-account pricing (Modiva, Zernio, Ayrshare) scales with how many profiles you connect and is predictable for steady posting. Per-post pricing (bundle.social, Outstand) favors many accounts with low volume: an agency connecting 200 client profiles that each post weekly does better per post, while a brand posting 50 times a day per account does better per account. Credit pricing (Blotato) bundles AI generation with distribution, which is fine until an always-on agent drains credits mid-month.
Free tiers differ in kind, not just size: Modiva and Zernio give free connected accounts with no post cap, bundle.social and SocialAPI.ai give small monthly post allowances, and Ayrshare, Postiz's cloud and Blotato offer trials rather than free tiers.
MCP support: hosted, local, or docs-only
Every vendor now says 'MCP' somewhere; the implementations differ enough to change your architecture. Hosted MCP servers (Modiva, Zernio, Outstand, SocialAPI.ai) are remote endpoints: point Claude or Cursor at a URL with a key and tools appear, with OAuth handled server-side. Local MCP integrations (bundle.social today, per its own docs) run on the developer's machine and call the vendor API from there. And docs-search MCPs (Ayrshare's official server) help you write code against the API rather than executing actions; Ayrshare's action-executing MCP is a community project. If the goal is an agent that acts unattended, a hosted, action-executing server is the requirement to verify.
Auth handling: who carries the OAuth burden
All of these vendors host OAuth in some form; the differences are in tenancy and credential custody. If you are building a SaaS where end users connect their own accounts, look for real multi-tenant design: SocialAPI.ai leads with OAuth 2.1, PKCE and dynamic client registration for exactly this case, and Modiva is multi-tenant with per-workspace connections and envelope-encrypted (AES-256-GCM) token storage. If you self-host (Postiz, Upload-Post's open-source client), the platform apps, scopes and token refresh become your operational problem, which is precisely what most teams are paying to avoid.
The honest bottom line
Social-only and price-sensitive with steady volume: Zernio and Outstand are strong, and Socialync-class tools are cheaper still if an app (not an API) is acceptable. Many accounts, low per-account volume: bundle.social's unlimited-accounts model fits. Multi-tenant SaaS where users connect their own profiles: shortlist SocialAPI.ai and Modiva. Broadest niche-channel coverage from a long-standing vendor: Ayrshare. Need ads, CRM or ecommerce behind the same key, or an agent that does more than post: that is the gap Modiva was built for. Whatever you pick, re-verify pricing on the vendor's site; several of these numbers moved in the last year.
FAQ
What is a unified social media API?
One REST API that fronts many social platforms: a single auth model, one request shape for posting and reading data, and the vendor maintains the underlying per-platform integrations, app reviews and API changes for you.
Which unified social media APIs have MCP servers?
As of July 2026: Modiva, Zernio, Outstand and SocialAPI.ai run hosted MCP servers; Upload-Post offers hosted plus an open-source client; bundle.social's MCP runs locally per its docs; Ayrshare's official MCP searches its documentation, with action execution via a community tool.
How is a unified API priced?
Three common models: per connected account (Modiva, Zernio, Ayrshare), per post volume (bundle.social, Outstand) and per AI credit (Blotato). Estimate with your real ratio of accounts to posts; the same workload can differ by an order of magnitude across models.
Do I still need platform approval (Meta review, LinkedIn partner access)?
No, that is the core value: the vendor's platform apps already passed Meta app review, TikTok's audit and LinkedIn's partner process. Your users authorize through the vendor's approved apps with standard OAuth consent screens.
Try the hosted MCP server
Start freeKeep reading
Third-party product names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners; Modiva is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. Facts about other products were verified from public sources on July 5, 2026 and may have changed since. Please confirm current features and pricing on each vendor's website.